Learning Engagement Platform
360Learning vs Guesty
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
360Learning (Learning Engagement Platform) and Guesty both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
360Learning (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Guesty (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 32). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Guesty is ahead of 360Learning. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Guesty is slightly ahead of 360Learning. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), 360Learning is ahead of Guesty. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Guesty is ahead of 360Learning.
360Learning carries 120 GitHub stars across 10 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Guesty shows 1 stars across 21 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but 360Learning's footprint is roughly 120.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
360Learning is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Guesty looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | 360Learning | Guesty |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #668 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 32 |
| Code | 36 | 36 |
| Education | 50 | 67 |
| Community | 22 | 28 |
| Reach | 11 | 0 |
| Momentum | 10 | 20 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 120 | 1 |
| Forks | 87 | 22 |
| Public repos | 10 | 21 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 1 |
| External contributors | 1 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 29 | 27 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 29 | 36 |