360Learning vs draw.io

360Learning (Learning Engagement Platform) and draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a modest lead over 360Learning (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), draw.io is slightly ahead of 360Learning. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is ahead of 360Learning. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is clearly ahead of 360Learning. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is clearly ahead of 360Learning. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), draw.io is clearly ahead of 360Learning.

360Learning carries 120 GitHub stars across 10 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. draw.io shows 86,983 stars across 32 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 724.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

360Learning is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. draw.io looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.