A/B Smartly vs Close

A/B Smartly (A/B Smartly - Your A/B Testing Platform) and Close (The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Close (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over A/B Smartly (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 37). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), A/B Smartly is slightly ahead of Close. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), A/B Smartly is ahead of Close. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Close is ahead of A/B Smartly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), A/B Smartly is ahead of Close. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Close is ahead of A/B Smartly.

A/B Smartly carries 39 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Close shows 3,871 stars across 190 public repos, 25 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Close's footprint is roughly 99.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

A/B Smartly is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Close looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.