A/B Smartly vs Fillout

A/B Smartly (A/B Smartly - Your A/B Testing Platform) and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

A/B Smartly and Fillout sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (37), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), A/B Smartly is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), A/B Smartly is clearly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of A/B Smartly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of A/B Smartly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), A/B Smartly is clearly ahead of Fillout.

A/B Smartly carries 39 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but A/B Smartly's footprint is roughly 19.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

A/B Smartly is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.