Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Airtable

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Airtable (Airtable is a modern database created for everyone) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Airtable (rank #165) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 38). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Airtable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Airtable is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Airtable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Airtable is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Airtable.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Airtable shows 3,237 stars across 35 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Airtable looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignAirtable
Ranking
Overall rank#485#165
Pillars
Overall3851
Code5545
Education6672
Community3423
Reach3061
Momentum126
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6533,237
Forks1,879843
Public repos8835
Active repos (90d)63
External contributors31
Avg polish5543
Avg AI-readiness3226

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Airtable developer profile