Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Amplitude

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Amplitude both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Amplitude (rank #93) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 38). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amplitude is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Amplitude. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Amplitude shows 3,167 stars across 151 public repos, 39 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Amplitude looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignAmplitude
Ranking
Overall rank#485#93
Pillars
Overall3856
Code5570
Education6642
Community3442
Reach3021
Momentum1272
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6533,167
Forks1,8791,052
Public repos88151
Active repos (90d)639
External contributors323
Avg polish5570
Avg AI-readiness3244

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Amplitude developer profile