ActiveCampaign vs Apollo.io

ActiveCampaign and Apollo.io (Apollo's github repo. Be awed) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Apollo.io (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 34). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Apollo.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Apollo.io is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Apollo.io. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Apollo.io is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Apollo.io is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Apollo.io shows 73 stars across 41 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 91.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Apollo.io looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.