ActiveCampaign vs Baremetrics

ActiveCampaign and Baremetrics (Subscription Analytics & Insights. One click and you get hundreds of valuable metrics & business insights from Stripe, Recurly, Braintree and more!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Baremetrics (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 37). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Baremetrics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Baremetrics is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Baremetrics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Baremetrics is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Baremetrics shows 908 stars across 15 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 7.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Baremetrics looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.