ActiveCampaign vs Brex
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ActiveCampaign and Brex both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Brex (rank #257) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 38). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Brex. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Brex is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Brex is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Brex is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Brex is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.
ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Brex shows 10,822 stars across 84 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Brex looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Brex |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #257 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 47 |
| Code | 55 | 49 |
| Education | 66 | 71 |
| Community | 34 | 43 |
| Reach | 30 | 46 |
| Momentum | 12 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,653 | 10,822 |
| Forks | 1,879 | 699 |
| Public repos | 88 | 84 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 28 |
| External contributors | 3 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 49 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 42 |