ActiveCampaign vs Cloudbeds

ActiveCampaign and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 30). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,622 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 135.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Cloudbeds looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.