ActiveCampaign vs CrowdStrike

ActiveCampaign and CrowdStrike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

CrowdStrike (rank #55) holds a meaningful lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 38). The gap of 22 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), CrowdStrike is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), CrowdStrike is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. CrowdStrike shows 5,991 stars across 267 public repos, 74 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. CrowdStrike looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.