ActiveCampaign vs Doctolib

ActiveCampaign and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 33). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 8.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Doctolib looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.