ActiveCampaign vs Docusign Inc.

ActiveCampaign and Docusign Inc. (Join the Docusign Developer Community - https://community.docusign.com/developer-59) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Docusign Inc. (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 38). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Docusign Inc. is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Docusign Inc. is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Docusign Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Docusign Inc. is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Docusign Inc. is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Docusign Inc. shows 1,533 stars across 182 public repos, 42 active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 4.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Docusign Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.