Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Doist

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 38). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Doist shows 5,576 stars across 170 public repos, 45 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Doist looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignDoist
Ranking
Overall rank#485#122
Pillars
Overall3854
Code5559
Education6685
Community3436
Reach3040
Momentum1246
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6535,576
Forks1,879563
Public repos88170
Active repos (90d)645
External contributors321
Avg polish5558
Avg AI-readiness3247

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Doist developer profile