ActiveCampaign vs Ecwid

ActiveCampaign and Ecwid both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #484) holds a narrow lead over Ecwid (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 30). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Ecwid. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Ecwid. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Ecwid. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Ecwid.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Ecwid shows 1,169 stars across 43 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 5.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Ecwid makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.