ActiveCampaign vs edX

ActiveCampaign and edX (Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

edX (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), edX is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of edX. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), edX is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), edX is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. edX shows 392 stars across 250 public repos, 52 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 17.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. edX looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.