ActiveCampaign vs Elastic Path Software

ActiveCampaign and Elastic Path Software both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Elastic Path Software (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 31). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Elastic Path Software is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Elastic Path Software. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Elastic Path Software. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Elastic Path Software is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Elastic Path Software shows 234 stars across 39 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 28.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Elastic Path Software looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.