ActiveCampaign vs Element

ActiveCampaign and Element (Founded by the creators of Matrix, we build digitally sovereign, secure and interoperable real-time communication solutions for large organisations.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Element (rank #189) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 38). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Element is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Element. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Element is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Element is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Element is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Element shows 34,608 stars across 137 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 97 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Element's footprint is roughly 5.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Element looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.