ActiveCampaign vs Evernote
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ActiveCampaign and Evernote both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Evernote (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 35). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Evernote. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Evernote is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Evernote. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Evernote is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Evernote.
ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Evernote shows 9,832 stars across 22 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Evernote looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Evernote |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 35 |
| Code | 55 | 45 |
| Education | 66 | 78 |
| Community | 34 | 18 |
| Reach | 30 | 32 |
| Momentum | 12 | 2 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,653 | 9,832 |
| Forks | 1,879 | 1,848 |
| Public repos | 88 | 22 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 1 |
| External contributors | 3 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 49 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 32 |