Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Fivetran

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Fivetran both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fivetran (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Fivetran is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Fivetran. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fivetran is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fivetran is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fivetran is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Fivetran shows 13,433 stars across 314 public repos, 84 active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Fivetran looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignFivetran
Ranking
Overall rank#485#338
Pillars
Overall3843
Code5557
Education6646
Community3446
Reach3039
Momentum1254
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,65313,433
Forks1,8792,907
Public repos88314
Active repos (90d)684
External contributors340
Avg polish5566
Avg AI-readiness3241

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Fivetran developer profile