ActiveCampaign vs Grammarly

ActiveCampaign and Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Grammarly (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 34). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Grammarly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Grammarly is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Grammarly is ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Grammarly shows 4,355 stars across 23 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Grammarly looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.