ActiveCampaign vs Gusto

ActiveCampaign and Gusto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Gusto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Gusto is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Gusto is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Gusto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gusto is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Gusto shows 781 stars across 148 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 8.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Gusto looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.