ActiveCampaign vs Hashnode
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ActiveCampaign and Hashnode (Everything you need to start blogging as a developer!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Hashnode (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 33). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Hashnode. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Hashnode. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hashnode is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hashnode is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Hashnode.
ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Hashnode shows 6,853 stars across 26 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Hashnode looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Hashnode |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 33 |
| Code | 55 | 51 |
| Education | 66 | 49 |
| Community | 34 | 38 |
| Reach | 30 | 32 |
| Momentum | 12 | 6 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,653 | 6,853 |
| Forks | 1,879 | 2,389 |
| Public repos | 88 | 26 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 56 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 26 |