Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Heap

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Heap (Product Insights) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Heap (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 35). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Heap. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Heap is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Heap.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Heap shows 215 stars across 65 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 30.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Heap looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignHeap
Ranking
Overall rank#485#569
Pillars
Overall3835
Code5535
Education6672
Community3414
Reach3030
Momentum1212
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,653215
Forks1,879105
Public repos8865
Active repos (90d)66
External contributors31
Avg polish5537
Avg AI-readiness3223

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Heap developer profile