ActiveCampaign vs Jamf

ActiveCampaign and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 38). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.