ActiveCampaign vs KAYAK
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ActiveCampaign and KAYAK both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ActiveCampaign and KAYAK sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (38), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), KAYAK is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of KAYAK. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of KAYAK. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), KAYAK is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), KAYAK is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.
ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. KAYAK shows 3,186 stars across 72 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. KAYAK looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | KAYAK |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 38 |
| Code | 55 | 59 |
| Education | 66 | 59 |
| Community | 34 | 30 |
| Reach | 30 | 44 |
| Momentum | 12 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,653 | 3,186 |
| Forks | 1,879 | 462 |
| Public repos | 88 | 72 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 4 |
| External contributors | 3 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 56 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 44 |