Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs KAYAK

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and KAYAK both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign and KAYAK sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (38), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), KAYAK is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of KAYAK. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of KAYAK. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), KAYAK is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), KAYAK is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. KAYAK shows 3,186 stars across 72 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. KAYAK looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignKAYAK
Ranking
Overall rank#485#485
Pillars
Overall3838
Code5559
Education6659
Community3430
Reach3044
Momentum1236
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6533,186
Forks1,879462
Public repos8872
Active repos (90d)64
External contributors31
Avg polish5556
Avg AI-readiness3244

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView KAYAK developer profile