ActiveCampaign vs Keeper Security

ActiveCampaign and Keeper Security (Creators of the leading privileged access management platform securing organizations against data breaches and cyber threats.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Keeper Security (rank #278) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 38). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Keeper Security is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Keeper Security is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Keeper Security is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Keeper Security. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Keeper Security is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Keeper Security shows 508 stars across 63 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 13.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Keeper Security looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.