ActiveCampaign vs Lansweeper NV

ActiveCampaign and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 30). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lansweeper NV is ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.