ActiveCampaign vs Linear

ActiveCampaign and Linear (A purpose-built tool for planning and building products) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Linear (rank #103) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 38). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Linear. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Linear. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Linear is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Linear is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Linear is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Linear shows 1,971 stars across 22 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 3.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Linear looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.