ActiveCampaign vs LinkedIn

ActiveCampaign and LinkedIn both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

LinkedIn (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of LinkedIn. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LinkedIn is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. LinkedIn shows 77,785 stars across 137 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LinkedIn's footprint is roughly 11.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. LinkedIn looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.