ActiveCampaign vs Miro

ActiveCampaign and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign and Miro sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (38), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Miro.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 7.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.