ActiveCampaign vs Narmi

ActiveCampaign and Narmi (Narmi modernizes financial institutions and the people they serve with digital-first banking solutions and an agile open platform.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #486) holds a narrow lead over Narmi (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 30). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Narmi. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Narmi. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Narmi. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Narmi. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Narmi is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,622 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Narmi shows 69 stars across 10 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 96.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Narmi looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.