Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Okta, Inc

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Okta, Inc both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Okta, Inc (rank #73) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (58 vs 38). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Okta, Inc is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Okta, Inc is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Okta, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Okta, Inc shows 6,250 stars across 88 public repos, 44 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Okta, Inc looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignOkta, Inc
Ranking
Overall rank#485#73
Pillars
Overall3858
Code5566
Education6677
Community3442
Reach3029
Momentum1245
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6536,250
Forks1,8795,038
Public repos8888
Active repos (90d)644
External contributors352
Avg polish5566
Avg AI-readiness3248

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Okta, Inc developer profile