ActiveCampaign vs Quo

ActiveCampaign and Quo (World's best business phone app) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 33). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Quo shows 12 stars across 20 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 554.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Quo looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.