ActiveCampaign vs ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company

ActiveCampaign and ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (Open, federated file sync & share. The original Enterprise File Sync and Share. AI-contributions welcome.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (rank #165) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 38). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company shows 18,930 stars across 178 public repos, 100 active in the last 90 days and 35 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.