ActiveCampaign vs Patreon

ActiveCampaign and Patreon both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Patreon (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 36). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Patreon. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Patreon. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Patreon. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Patreon is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Patreon.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Patreon shows 846 stars across 62 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 7.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Patreon looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.