ActiveCampaign vs Productboard

ActiveCampaign and Productboard (Make things that matter, together. See also @productboardlabs) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Productboard (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 33). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Productboard. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Productboard. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Productboard. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Productboard. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Productboard is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Productboard shows 90 stars across 87 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 73.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Productboard looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.