Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Proton Mail

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Proton Mail both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Proton Mail (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 38). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Proton Mail is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Proton Mail. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Proton Mail is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Proton Mail is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Proton Mail is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Proton Mail shows 16,265 stars across 186 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Proton Mail looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignProton Mail
Ranking
Overall rank#485#401
Pillars
Overall3841
Code5564
Education6642
Community3446
Reach3044
Momentum1252
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,65316,265
Forks1,8792,240
Public repos88186
Active repos (90d)619
External contributors320
Avg polish5574
Avg AI-readiness3232

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Proton Mail developer profile