Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Razorpay

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #31) holds a meaningful lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 38). The gap of 25 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,812 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignRazorpay
Ranking
Overall rank#485#31
Pillars
Overall3863
Code5568
Education6653
Community3444
Reach3058
Momentum1271
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6533,812
Forks1,8791,929
Public repos88177
Active repos (90d)638
External contributors333
Avg polish5569
Avg AI-readiness3249

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Razorpay developer profile