ActiveCampaign vs Rippling

ActiveCampaign and Rippling (We make it unbelievably easy to manage your team's payroll, benefits, computers, and apps.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Rippling (rank #455) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 38). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Rippling. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Rippling. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Rippling. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Rippling is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Rippling.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Rippling shows 156 stars across 11 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 42.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Rippling looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.