Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Sage

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 33). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sage is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Sage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Sage.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 3.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Sage looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignSage
Ranking
Overall rank#485#625
Pillars
Overall3833
Code5556
Education6652
Community3434
Reach3023
Momentum1212
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6532,180
Forks1,879430
Public repos88122
Active repos (90d)66
External contributors322
Avg polish5552
Avg AI-readiness3238

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Sage developer profile