ActiveCampaign vs Skyscanner

ActiveCampaign and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 38). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Skyscanner looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.