Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs SlackAPI

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and SlackAPI (https://docs.slack.dev/tools) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

SlackAPI (rank #47) holds a meaningful lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (61 vs 38). The gap of 23 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SlackAPI is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of SlackAPI. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SlackAPI is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of SlackAPI. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SlackAPI is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. SlackAPI shows 17,894 stars across 37 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. SlackAPI looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignSlackAPI
Ranking
Overall rank#485#47
Pillars
Overall3861
Code5585
Education6658
Community3442
Reach306
Momentum1276
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,65317,894
Forks1,8793,838
Public repos8837
Active repos (90d)619
External contributors339
Avg polish5590
Avg AI-readiness3255

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView SlackAPI developer profile