Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs SoundCloud

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and SoundCloud both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over SoundCloud (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 36). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is ahead of SoundCloud. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of SoundCloud. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SoundCloud is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SoundCloud is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SoundCloud is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. SoundCloud shows 8,606 stars across 56 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. SoundCloud looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignSoundCloud
Ranking
Overall rank#485#536
Pillars
Overall3836
Code5542
Education6661
Community3439
Reach3045
Momentum1243
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6538,606
Forks1,8791,142
Public repos8856
Active repos (90d)617
External contributors34
Avg polish5546
Avg AI-readiness3232

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView SoundCloud developer profile