ActiveCampaign vs Sprout Social

ActiveCampaign and Sprout Social both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Sprout Social (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 38). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Sprout Social. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Sprout Social. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Sprout Social. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sprout Social is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Sprout Social shows 313 stars across 68 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 21.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Sprout Social looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.