ActiveCampaign vs Teamwork.com

ActiveCampaign and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 38). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Teamwork.com is ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 3.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.