ActiveCampaign vs Typeform

ActiveCampaign and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 38). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 11.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.