Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Wisepops

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Wisepops both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Wisepops (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 31). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Wisepops. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wisepops is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Wisepops. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Wisepops. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wisepops is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Wisepops shows 0 stars across 5 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wisepops looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignWisepops
Ranking
Overall rank#485#693
Pillars
Overall3831
Code5531
Education6688
Community340
Reach300
Momentum1215
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6530
Forks1,8790
Public repos885
Active repos (90d)61
External contributors30
Avg polish5522
Avg AI-readiness3225

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Wisepops developer profile