ActiveCampaign vs Wrike

ActiveCampaign and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ActiveCampaign (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 34). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wrike is ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ActiveCampaign's footprint is roughly 24.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.