ActiveCampaign vs Zammad

ActiveCampaign and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 38). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ActiveCampaign is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.